How Much Money is Enough?

Picture of metal box with $100 bills. How much money is enough to retire or change careers? As my wealth has increased, I've found that net worth is an imperfect measure of enough.A few years ago, somebody asked how much money is enough for me to retire.

I used a back of the napkin estimation based on the financial independence number and answered.

This was 2015-ish.

At the time, I thought the number would be more than enough to live comfortably for the rest of our lives, fund our three children’s college educations, and still travel in retirement.

But sometime in Q4 2019, our family’s net worth (minus home equity) surpassed the number, and since then, we’ve left it in the dust thanks to the Covid-19 dip and recovery rally. 

According to the 2015 RBD, I could stop working my full-time job today.

Yet here I am, with no immediate plans to leave my career.  

As my wealth has grown, I’ve found that net worth alone is an imperfect indicator of enough

Enough for What?

It’s hard to determine how much money is enough if you haven’t defined your objective.

Enough varies based on many factors, including your life stage, financial needs, and desired outcomes.

How much money is enough to:

  • Retire at age 55 and never work again?
  • Retire at 50 and work part-time in retirement until age 65?
  • Quit your day job to become an entrepreneur? 
  • Leave your high-paying career for a lower-paying, more meaningful opportunity?
  • Retire with enough to leave an inheritance for your family?

Figuring out precisely what you want is essential, so you’re pursuing the right outcome.

The ideal outcome is not always clear.  

My goal since 2003 is to retire and never work again at age 55, so I can travel six months out of the year.

I was 27, single, and living with my parents when I set that goal. 

Eighteen years later, my reality has changed. Kids, future college costs, new interests, and a greater sense of purpose have changed how I think about a traditional retirement. 

Working at the same corporate job for the next ten years and retiring at age 55 to travel may not be the optimal route.

I’m now looking at hybrid models, where I potentially “retire” from my lifelong career to pursue more exciting work. 

Early career retirement is more achievable if you have an alternate plan to earn.

Instead of continuing a moderately satisfying career, I may determine I have enough to change my profession to something more energizing. 

But enough money may not be the bottom-right cell value of a complicated spreadsheet.

So How Much Money is Enough?

Wealth is relative — no doubt about that. 

$1 million is very different in San Francisco, rural Nebraska, and rural Cambodia.

By conservative measures, my family’s net worth places us in the top 10% of the wealthy families in the U.S. and 1% worldwide. Yet, we don’t feel wealthy living in the Washington D.C. metro region. 

We’re not alone. 

CNBC looked at data from a 2019 Charles Schwab survey and compiled the following list about what level of net worth it would take to be considered wealthy.

Here are the results:

Gen Z: It takes $1.49 million to be considered wealthy
Millennials: It takes $1.94 million to be considered wealthy
Gen X: It takes $2.53 million to be considered wealthy
Boomers: It takes $2.63 million to be considered wealthy

The survey asked people of all levels of wealth, and that’s the average. Half of the GenXers think it takes more than $2.5 million to be considered wealthy, and I tend to agree. 

But just because someone hits a particular net worth level doesn’t mean it’s enough

For example, $2.5 million isn’t enough to live off for 30 years if annual expenses exceed $110,000. 

Factor in life expectancy, market risk, Social Security, and rising healthcare costs, and the calculation is more complicated than napkin math. 

My favorite retirement calculator to determine how much money is enough to retire is New Retirement. It digs into the nitty-gritty and challenges aspiring retirees to consider difficult scenarios. 

I demonstrated how this simulator works in a post about whether I can retire at age 55

The answer was yes, I’m on track.

But calculators are field guides, not treasure maps. Retirement planning doesn’t end when you find “X” marking the spot.

Why Net Worth is an Imperfect Measure of Enough

Net worth can be a good indicator of wealth (e.g., Forbes 400 List). 

But it’s flawed when trying to determine enough because it doesn’t measure liquidity, income, or personal circumstances. 

And it doesn’t measure greed — when there is no enough.  

Have you ever heard a billionaire complain about higher taxes because they can’t pay them? Ridiculous, right?

Most billionaires have their money tied up in assets such as businesses, stocks, and real estate.

It takes cash to pay taxes, which means the billionaires would have to liquidate assets (the very things making them super-wealthy).

Liquidation causes taxable events (capital gains) to pay the higher taxes, increasing the tax consequences even more!

The rest of us are affected by liquidity, too, among other things that make net worth an imperfect measure of wealth. 

1. Retirement Assets are Illiquid (mostly)

The bulk of my assets are in retirement accounts, which are designed to encourage saving but discourage withdrawals before age 59 1/2. 

Sure, there are ways to get money out of retirement accounts to cover living expenses before age 59 1/2. 

But tapping tax-advantaged funds before retirement age defeats the purpose of retirement accounts. That money is for spending from age ~60 to ~100 (if that’s the goal). 

Since retirement money is illiquid but often makes up a large portion of net worth, it’s not an immediate contributor to determining how much money is enough if your age is significantly under 60.

For those under 60, liquid non-retirement assets are a better measurement of how much money is enough.

2. Home Equity is Illiquid (mostly)

Homeowners store wealth in their homes.

Home equity equals an estimated home value minus any debts secured by the home (e.g., mortgage, HELOC).

The wealth stored in your home is mostly useless unless you take out a home equity loan or line of credit. 

It doesn’t move the enough needle much at all unless you intend to sell the home and move somewhere cheaper. 

As long as there’s a mortgage payment, there’s reduced monthly cash flow. Oppressive mortgage payments prolong careers. 

A paid-off home is a strong marker of wealth and freedom because no mortgage payment means lower recurring expenses. 

According to the Census Bureau‘s The Wealth of Households: 2017 published in August 2020:

In 2017, home equity and retirement accounts composed the majority of household wealth, at 61.7%. Specifically, 32.8% of household wealth is held in retirement accounts, and home equity accounted for 28%. 

So on average, Americans under age 60 could take their net worth and multiply it by 0.38 (= 1.00 – .62) to determine if their liquid net worth is sufficiently enough.

3. Net Worth Doesn’t Measure Income

Net worth doesn’t measure income, which is an essential consideration for wealth. 

Both active income (salaried and business) and passive income (investment) are important factors when considering how much money is enough – though, income is relative too. 

A person with a $500,000 salary might seem wealthy, but not if they spend $475,000 a year.

If that person spends $250,000 a year, they’re rich. 

What you keep outweighs what you earn. 

Passive income comes from income-producing assets, investments that generate cash flow. 

Building enough passive income to cover annual expenses is the holy grail because there’s no need to sell assets, and your wealth continues to grow. 

Most affluent people are not slowly becoming less wealthy. They are becoming more wealthy.

This means their assets appreciate and produce enough income or support safe withdrawals to cover living expenses.  

If the income is more than enough, that leaves enough excess cash flow left over to save and invest, compounding wealth.

A higher net worth indicates the ability to generate income and compound wealth, but not always.

4. Net Worth is Today, Not the Future

Here’s an extreme example. 

Let’s pretend the net worth of a 75-year-old with a $2 million bond portfolio is the same as a 30-something business founder with a $2 million equity stake in an emerging cloud AI blockchain SaaS data analytics startup.

Who will be wealthier in 10 years?

Doesn’t matter. 

The point is that net worth is a snapshot in time, today. It doesn’t account for the estimated rate of asset growth.

5. Family Structure

If I were single with no kids, I’d have enough money to leave my career and retire permanently today.

But when I reference net worth, it’s family net worth — what both myself and Mrs. RBD bring to the table.

Healthcare is WAY cheaper on your own. 

Living alone would make it easy to maintain reduced spending rates.

Housing options multiply, costs go way down.

Time is untethered from others.

College costs are in the rear-view mirror. 

On the flip side, my family motivates me to earn and be successful in everything I do. Maybe I wouldn’t be so adept at building wealth if I were still single with no kids. 

Wealth is relative. 

A $1 million net worth is different for families of 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, or 6 people, largely depending on income sources (single or multiple) and age.

My situation is a common one, with young kids and college expenses in our future. Once our kids are grown and independent, our living expenses should decrease significantly.

But that’s not until 2037. 

Other families may care for older dependents, making it more challenging ever to reach enough.

Is Financial Independence Enough?

Remember the financial independence number and how to calculate it?

The financial independence number, in basic terms, is equal to 25 times your annual expenses.

When your invested assets (excluding primary home equity) reach that number, or when passive income covers annual expenses, you’ve reached financial independence.

That’s is a rule of thumb, not a law. 

Though several financial advisors and mathematicians have run the math — it’s a fairly reliable model over an ensuing 30-year period.

Save more than 25X, and you can increase living expenses or expand the time horizon. 

So it’s enough for many people, especially those who live a frugal lifestyle with little intent to increase spending beyond the rate of inflation. 

Not everyone is comfortable declaring they are prepared to keep spending stable indefinitely. 

Some people want to travel lavishly. 

Others might want to remodel their home, increase their entertainment budget, or end up spending more than anticipated after leaving the workforce. 

Still, others may want or need to support family members or worry about unpredictable events. 

What the financial independence number doesn’t account for is extreme uncertainty

This is why people that reach the point of enough often choose to keep earning. 

Life throws nefarious curveballs. 

Is 25 times your annual expenses enough? Yes, probably.

But most of us like a healthy buffer. 

My Enough

Enough to me is more about regaining control of my time than having enough money to retire. 

Now that my wealth has grown past the napkin number from 2015, I feel more financially secure in our situation. 

Our net worth is considerably higher than it was when I lost my job in 2017. When that happened, we easily lived for four months with no salary. 

With increased financial security, I’m more inclined to believe our family has enough for me to leave my career sooner than age 55 (a possibility I’ve considered before). 

If we cut expenses even more or move for a lower cost of living, it could happen sooner. 

But retiring from a career doesn’t mean never earning active income again.

Quite the contrary, leaving a career can open up exciting opportunities to earn. 

Backstopped by significant cash savings (due to my investment property), my passive and business income streams are likely enough to support my family while I blaze a different profession or double-down on my business. 

The idea of having more time to focus on entrepreneurship is more appealing than my current day job.

However, I’m still hypnotized by the extraordinary healthcare, benefits, and an addictive paycheck. And grateful after being unemployed for a period.

Having a steady job with a stable company is like sitting in a comfortable office chair — it feels good while you’re sitting there, but a walk outside is more enjoyable. 

Full-time entrepreneurship would bring a different kind of stress, but self-employment would give me complete control of my time, something I’ll never have with a full-time career. 

The desire to control my time is what motivated me to set a retirement goal in the first place. But maybe I’m not pursuing a retirement goal after all.

How much money is enough for you?
Photo by S K via Pixabay


Favorite tools and investment services right now:

Sure Dividend — Download the free Dividend Kings list, 50+ stocks with 50+ consecutive years of dividend increases. (review)

Fundrise — Simple real estate and venture capital investing for as little as $10. (review)

NewRetirement — Spreadsheets are insufficient. Get serious about planning for retirement. (review)

M1 Finance — A top online broker for long-term investors and dividend reinvestment. (review)

Comments Welcome!

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.


  1. Nancy Finney says:

    As usual, I appreciate your thoughts. I agree with the desire for more time. I’ve worked hard to get my current CFO position and have 4 weeks vacation AND we get every other Friday off. This flexibility has satisfied my travel desires, so I’m not in a hurry to quit the day job. We are very focused on increased earnings coupled with high savings rates, travel rewards programs and intelligent spending. It works.

    1. There are so many components to think about. That’s why it’s unrealistic to boil “enough” down to a single number. Thanks for sharing.

  2. “Having a steady job with a stable company is like sitting in a comfortable office chair — it feels good while you’re sitting there, but a walk outside is more enjoyable.”

    Great quote, RBD. I appreciate your transparency as you work through answering the question each of us must answer. In my case, I decided to work One More Year “just to be safe”, and retired 2 years ago at Age 55. That extra year has made my retirement more enjoyable as our finances contain a bit of a hedge against the unforseen. That said, I can’t tell you how much I’m enjoying retirement, words would never suffice. It’s a great time in life. Don’t get too comfortable in that chair, life is always better outside (once you have “Enough”).

    1. Hey Fritz,
      I’ve come to think that “one more year syndrome” is a good thing, as long as the work is not mentally taxing. Seems like you enjoyed your career. We all learned a lot from that conversation we had a while back. Building in that buffer for uncertainly is a big part of enjoying the extra free time.

  3. Anonymous says:

    It’s amazing how much competing interests in real time can muddy the waters of enough. I appreciate the clarity of statements like “Building enough passive income to cover annual expenses” and “when invested assets equal/surpass 25x annual expenses”.

    Converting bonus money to time off next year feels like a very smart move for my quality of life and should add a lot of sustainability to my career.

    Enough would be the ability to work from home/work less days a week/have time and energy for other projects/going from 1 to 4 weeks off a year. Agreed, passive income covering expenses w/ some left over to increase wealth would/should be enough.

    On Assets…I’m at 41.9% retirement; 28.4% Home Equity…9.3% Cash, 13.5% Roth, 3.2% Taxable, 3.7% Whole Life Cash Value w/ the mortgage at -7.27%.

    I’ve been more in favor of knocking out the mortgage debt than investing in taxable accounts…though regularly question the logic (other than psychologically not having it over my head and a lower cash flow requirement were I to downgrade jobs). Paying off the mortgage would reduce annual expenses but obviously at the expense of growing the investments that can grow and pay off the mortgage.

    Yes, despite growing net worth, a lot of it is on the other side of liquidity. For the <60 crowd, enough as liquid invested assets equal/surpassing 25x annual expenses is still a ways away…but a clarifying objective. Another enjoyable post. Thank you RBD.

    1. Thanks for sharing your details. Mortgage freedom may be underrated. Talk to people that don’t have a mortgage payment and they’re never regretful (they can always go back). I’m still torn about mortgage paydown or not. Rates are so low, but that monthly payment is a burden, that often forces people to remain in the workforce.

      1. Anonymous says:

        Carrying a mortgage assumes your income is uninterrupted over the duration of the planned payoff period. I’ve never counted my job/wage income as fixed and have been working towards knocking off this known liability while I’m still employed. I’ve only recently been making 6figures and don’t know that that would be the case at another job in the same industry much less a job in a different industry (after nearly 20years in the same industry).

        I have an Australian buddy who is probably mid30s who has paid for his house….but is basically starting from scratch on the investment side…that’s been a helpful reference point…I’d rather err towards using some more time and have a stronger position all around later vs immediate payoff. I’m fairly evenly attacking retirement/home equity/(cash/roth/taxable) goals and it allows me to justify overpaying when the market goes down, and still enjoy market gains.

        In retrospect, it’s hard not to consider how investing taxably would have affected networth over the past 10yrs vs overpaying the mortgage…but I consider overpaying my mortgage as part of my risk profile.) It’s easy to flipflop in my thinking as their is merit on both sides…but meanwhile I’m just staying the course w/ the casino logic of last to have to decide/act has the advantage….i.e. don’t overcommit as most situations and decision making logic evolves over time (decades even)…the algorithm learns and the outcome is constantly adjusting to new life realities. Our lives are rarely as neat as our spreadsheets.

        1. I saw a quote on Twitter not long ago that said something like, a mortgage is a debt against your income, secured by your home. I think that reframes it a bit, but a bank can’t expect to give a 55-year-old a 30-year loan and expect them to work until 85. So they must factor in that average loans last 7-10 years, and inflation will eventually make the payment more affordable.

  4. Shannon@RetiresGreat says:

    Thank you for such a thought provoking post!

    I agree with Fritz “Having a steady job with a stable company is like sitting in a comfortable office chair — it feels good while you’re sitting there, but a walk outside is more enjoyable.”

    Ultimately, what matters financially is will your monthly retired income support your lifestyle? As you point out, there are many factors and indicators to determine this.

  5. Very thought provoking post for sure. It’s definitely important to have enough for your retirement and be comfortable with what you have stashed. For me Im happy with having just enough too live off of. Im not looking too be a millionaire. Im perfectly fine with being a thousandaire when I leave my job for good. My pension will take care of all needs I have.

    1. Well, a pension is a whole different story. My Dad retired below millionaire status with a pension, and it has worked out great. A secure pension is a good deal, if you can find one and put in the time to earn it. Good to hear you’ve got that lined up!

  6. Very much enjoyed reading this article, some really thoughtful stuff. Net worth is one thing, income stream is another thing. It also depends what you plan to do with your net worth. Do you plan to die broke? Or do you plan to pass down your assets and create a legacy?

    How much money is enough? That’s a very personal question. 🙂

    1. For investors like you, it is more about income. It was mostly for me too, until my retirement accounts really surged in value after so many years of investing (and bull markets). Where I once expected to earn enough dividend income, I should be able to retire sooner based on retirement asset withdrawals combined with dividends. Doesn’t hurt to diversify income streams 🙂

  7. Great article. I found once I reached that number, “working” for that paycheck was a lot less stressful. I am hanging on for the health benefits and building up those “non-retirement” fund accounts. I focus more on doing things at work that interest me or could help me after I leave work, It’s nice to have options.

    1. I’ve felt that way for some time now, that I don’t need this job or career. That is freeing, however, I’ve taken on a new position recently which has added some stress that wasn’t there before. It’s part of why I wrote this, because it’s been on my mind more.

  8. I’ve talk to a bunch of folks about this topic over the years, and I think you only have enough money when you actually take the leap of faith and stop working at your day job.

    Deep down, I think people know this. But due to not feeling entirely financially secure, they keep on working even though there are better things to do with their time.

    It’s the one more year syndrome over and over again. So I say, when you finally leave a steady paycheck behind, that is when you know you are truly financially independent.


  9. fraidycatfinance says:

    I’ve also had these thoughts about how the number is actually a bunch of numbers, and also a bunch of circumstances – 2020 has brought new elements to our family’s job satisfaction (no commute and fewer hours) and it’s hard to see ourselves being dissatisfied with those things for a long time!